đ§ the 8 things investors look for in a pitch (that you should too)
Let's dive deep into the 8 T's: team, TAM, timing, traction, theory, tracking, terms, and technology.
Hey friends đ
Only 16% of startups manage to raise money from angel investors.
By the time you get to Series A, that drops below 1%.
Why?
Itâs not complicated. Most of the time, they just werenât fundable.
If youâre raising a round (or will be soon), ensure you stand out by covering the eight Tâs investors look for in a pitch: team, TAM, timing, traction, theory, tracking, terms, and technology.
Letâs dive deep đ
The top of the list should be obvious:
1/ Team
In fact, starting with team is cliché.
Iâve talked about the importance of team so much that youâd think Iâd have little else to say.
And yet, I do.
Because the truth is that no one funds the B team. Weâll invest all day long in A teams with B ideas, but never B teams with A ideas â why?
Because an A team has a good chance of pivoting that B idea into a successful business, while a weak team will flub the A idea into a costly failure.
(btw⊠team is a lot more than just the founders)
So why are you the right team to go the distance here?
2/ Total Addressable Market (aka opportunity)
But thatâs not enough! There needs to be an opportunity.
You need to be tackling a really big problem in a really big (and growing) market.
That seems straightforward enough. But thereâs actually a lot more to it than it seems.
A âbig marketâ doesnât just mean there are a lot of people in it.
There also has to be desirability:
Lots of potential customers; AND
A big, unsolved (or poorly solved) problem; AND
A scalable, lovable, truly differentiated product that solves it; AND
An eagerness to pay for it.
When looking at your total addressable market, donât just consider the people and problem. Consider their eagerness to solve it. Start with a niche.
Remember â TAM isnât a number; itâs the opportunity.
Therefore, your pitch must include the size of the market, the severity of the pain, the urgency to solve it, and the evidence for why this is the right solution to it.
Because thatâs what makes an opportunity compelling.
3/ Timing
If the most common question is âwhy youâ, the second most common is âwhy nowâ.
In other words, why not a year ago? Or a year from now? What about the current market conditions make this the right moment to pursue this opportunity?
Evidence for timing is varied:
technological advancements & trends
shifts in consumer behaviour
regulatory changes
cultural moments
growing markets
emerging trends
competition
etc.
These are all signals that the conditions are ripe for rapid growth â youâre riding the wave, rather than paddling upstream.
Great timing is a superpower. Neglect it at your peril.
4/ Traction
Ok, right team, right market, right time â so how has that been working for you so far?
Traction is the acquisition of confirmatory data in support of a market hypothesis.
In other words, are customers saying yes?
The most straightforward way to think of this is sales, of course. But thatâs not the only way to measure of traction:
References
Retention
Referral
Sales
Pre-sales
Crowdfunding
Letters of intent
Waitlist/beta signups
Customer interviews
Validated research
They all count as traction â in descending order of persuasiveness.
Traction is a ladder, and the higher you are, the more risk you can accept, and the more funding you can acquire.
At the end of the day, traction is fairly simple:
Can you prove youâre solving a real problem for real people?
5/ Theory
Youâre the right team, on the right track, in the right market, at the right time, and thereâs potential to get huge â but youâre not huge yet.
You need a credible theory of how youâre going to get there.
In familiar startup terms, the theory is a combination of your business model and go-to-market strategy.
Your theory needs to have:
a compelling value prop
for an early adopter
who you can easily find & serve
in a way that makes money.
One of the most common shortcomings I see in startup pitches is a vague, unproved, or expensive go-to-market strategy.
Letâs do a sidebar.
The go to market component of theory is the intersection of two things:
An early adopter that gets you into the market; and
An efficient means of getting a message to them.
The biggest mistake founders make is to keep this high level: weâll run Instagram ads; weâll use influencers; weâll do network outreach; etc.
Youâre waving a magic wand, and magic wands are lazy. We hate them. And you should, too.
Youâre not a wizard, Harry.
Instead, use the âhow shovelâ: dig deeper by asking how.
Hereâs an example of a vague strategy:
Weâll target eco-conscious consumers who want sustainable cleaning solutions.
See how much clearer weâre getting?
Donât stop digging until you get mired in detail only the experts care about.
After all, if you canât get to that level, how can we expect you to execute on it?
No one will pay you to guess and check.
6/ Tracking
In the same vein, your ability to be successful is directly tied to your ability to identify and track the metrics that matter.
What gets measured is what gets improved, after all.
And your first instinct might be that itâs obvious â sales, of course!
But the problem with traditional metrics â revenue, market share, etc â is that they are zero on day 1, but still functionally zero on day 300.
These are lagging indicators of success. They tell you if what you did yesterday led to a result.
In an early-stage company, or when doing anything innovative, you need to find the leading indicators that tell you if the work youâre doing today is likely to lead to that result tomorrow.
In other words, taking a step back, what are the signals you can measure that point toward dollars and customers?
And then⊠what are the signals that weâre heading toward those signals that point toward dollars and customers?
And then⊠what are the signals that point toward those signals that point toward ⊠you get the idea.
Itâs turtles all the way down.
And itâs called innovation accounting: we focus on tracking actionable metrics of validated learning â such as customer engagement, retention, and other early indicators of product-market fit â and use iterative experiments to make data-driven decisions about whether to pivot, persevere, or abandon our ideas.
Finding the right metric is both an art and a science, but hereâs a straightforward example:
Letâs say your startup is a forthcoming meal subscription app. You might measure the conversion rate of users signing up after viewing a landing page, in order to validate whether their value proposition resonates with potential customers â before building the full product.
In other words, you canât track sales, because thereâs nothing to sell, but you can track whether or not users will even care.
Many are a lot less straightforward.
But always game it out like a chain of leading indicators. If youâre building an ad-based social platform:
To get revenue, you need advertisers.
To get advertisers, you need inventory.
To get inventory, you need engagement.
To get engagement, you need acquisition.
To get acquisition, you need a well-placed value prop.
etc.
Then, whatâs the lowest point on that ladder for which you donât have compelling evidence? Your metric is probably in there somewhere.
And if you want to gut check your metrics, feel free to book a session.
7/ Terms
All of this culminates in an ask of your investors:
We need X dollars for Y time period to get us to Z milestone.
For example:
Pre-seed: Weâre raising $250K for a 6-month runway to validate our initial product concept with 100 pilot users
Seed: Weâre raising $1M for a 12-month runway to scale our user base to 10,000 monthly active users and demonstrate product-market fit in our initial vertical.
Series A: Weâre raising $6M for a 24-month runway to build out our enterprise sales team and achieve a 3x increase in our B2B contract volume.
As the astute reader will have noted, the milestone is tightly related to the Tracking, though itâs not always identified as such in a high level pitch.
In fact, itâs pretty common to have a milestone of just the next round:
Weâre raising $2M for an 18-month runway to get us to a Series A.
But notice how comparatively weak that seems as an ask!
The reason it seems weaker is that it says neither what progress the money gets you, nor what you need to accomplish before you can successfully raise that next round.
This credibility is a big part of your investment readiness.
The ask isnât for investors to cover your expenses for a period of time. The ask is for them to help you reach a key milestone in that period of time.
8/ Technology
Itâs a little contrived, but I call this âTechnologyâ because it begins with a T. đ
Itâs more accurately represented as defensibility, or secret sauce:
Itâs the work product youâve created as a team in order to define and achieve the above, as well as why that creation wonât be obliterated by the market.
That defensibility is two things:
Breadth
Unfair advantage
A common problem with startup ideas is that they represent a feature instead of a business â meaning the concept is too narrow to stand alone as a full, scalable company. It solves a single problem without enough scope to address a broader market or generate sustained revenue.
These are also too easily obliterated by competitors who do offer a full solution â theyâll just add your feature to their product!
You need breadth, but itâs not enough.
You also need defensibility â meaning your company creates barriers to entry, making it difficult for competitors to replicate or outcompete. In other words, itâs your ability to sustain a competitive advantage.
For consumer packaged goods, inventions, and deep tech, this is often (though not always) patent protections on your core intellectual property.
For SaaS, it could include proprietary algorithms or unique expertise, but there are a number of additional ways to create barriers to entry:
A strong network effect
Accumulated unique data
Exceptional user or customer experience (loyalty)
Deep integration into customer workflows & ecosystems
etc.
How will you keep competitors at bay?
With all that under our belt, letâs circle back to the top-line:
A pitch is just a 10-slide story of these 8 Tâs.
Most of these map fairly closely:
Terms â ask
Team â team slide
Theory â business model & GTM slides
Some other Tâs donât have a dedicated slide, but find their way to multiple slides. For example, Tracking is often in the ask, traction, and roadmap slides, and often stated only implicitly.
But when one of the 8 Tâs is missing entirely, itâs pretty obvious.
Often glaringly so.
So if youâre fundraising, go through each of the 8 and make sure you have a theory of hugeness thatâs credible.
Until next week,
â jdm
PS: If you enjoyed this issue of Traction Thinking, Iâd be super grateful if you took a few seconds to share it with a founder friend. Referrals are a huge help in growing a newsletter â and really help getting more founders to think deeply about their path to traction.
And, as always, Iâd love to hear your thoughts. If you have ideas how to make this newsletter even better, have suggestions on future topics, or even just want to share what you thought of this issue, just hit reply or leave a comment.



When you say 10 slides, do you use the Kawasaki 10-slide pitch?